Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GreenCloud Virtual Printer

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 20:34, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

=[[GreenCloud Virtual Printer]]=

:{{la|GreenCloud Virtual Printer}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/GreenCloud_Virtual_Printer Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|GreenCloud Virtual Printer}})

Non-notable virtual printer software. I couldn't find any noteworthy mentions of it to justify its notability, other than a mention in CBS News. Blake Gripling (talk) 12:21, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Delete - No lasting coverage of notability. The news article is from 2012 and there is nothing else. One article in the news does not make it encyclopaedic. - Pmedema (talk) 12:50, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete - Non-notable commercial software product. WP is not a product review guide or a yellow pages for entrepreneurial advertising... Carrite (talk) 15:32, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable software, fails the general notability guidelines for lack of adequate coverage. I think CBS did sum it up correctly: “doesn't really deliver anything you couldn't do already” . --Bejnar (talk) 20:07, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:46, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:46, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete for now as I found nothing better than some links at News and browser thus no signs of better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 06:10, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.