Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenfield Advisors

:{{la|Greenfield Advisors}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Greenfield Advisors}})

I don't see how this meets WP:COMPANY. Wikipedia is not the Yellow Pages. bender235 (talk) 14:00, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

• Keep Could use a couple more references, but I think ref #3 in particular goes to notability, and if the Mundy article is merged in, #2 should also, if it doesn't already. Monty₈₄₅ 18:10, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
• Delete. Article is about a real estate and business consulting firm. The references are to appraisal business journals with small, specialized readerships. The chief claim to fame here seems to be the business's associations with notable events like the Exxon Valdez spill. That still does not establish that this firm itself had a significiant effect on history, culture, or the field. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 20:26, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
• Keep - If correctly sourced, the article could stand up. Eduemoni^↑talk↓ 21:51, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Regards, MacMed^talk_stalk 22:17, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

• Delete As noted above, there is no indication of notability, neither in the sources cited nor in the results of a Gnews search. Perchloric (talk) 02:23, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.