Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Timp

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Mgm|^(talk) 10:07, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Greg Timp]]=

:{{la|Greg Timp}} ([{{fullurl:Greg Timp|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Timp}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Fails WP:BIO. Also a possible COI since it was created by User:Htimp and the only edits by the user were related to the Greg Timp article.-- Alan Liefting (talk) - 02:43, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:17, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Strong keep. Several highly cited papers in Nature and Phys. Rev. Lett. according to Google scholar look like a pass of WP:PROF #1. And [https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/gtimp/www/timpbio.htm?uniq=-5gj6t4 according to his web site bio] he's a fellow of APS, AAAS, and IEEE, any one of which would be enough for #3. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:30, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Speedy Keep per David Eppstein. COI is not a reason for AfD and notability could easily be checked by using Google. Cleanup and expand the article, but let's not waste more time on this AfD. --Crusio (talk) 07:01, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.