Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregarious behaviour

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 15:13, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

=[[Gregarious behaviour]]=

:{{la|Gregarious behaviour}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gregarious_behaviour Stats])

:({{Find sources|Gregarious behaviour}})

Strange jumble of sentences that isn't quite an article or a disambig or a dictionary definition Bhny (talk) 14:27, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete. This is not encyclopedia material. There are many incoming links, but a typical usage in an article is "Muskellunge are sometimes gregarious, forming small schools in distinct territories". We should not be using overly specialized vocabulary in our articles in this way, if we can avoid it. bd2412 T 15:06, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.