Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grey Party

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per WP:SNOW. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:26, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

=[[Grey Party]]=

:{{la|Grey Party}} ([{{fullurl:Grey Party|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grey Party}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

The article is poorly written and makes little sense. Supported only by a dead link. The article says nothing about the party itself and may fail WP:NOPV. Does this party even exist any more? Cooltrainer Hugh (talk) 14:40, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete, no RS, appears to be pushing NPOV and more importantly, I suspect that this is either WP:HOAX or WP:MADEUP. Notice that there has been a Grey Party in the UK [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/999115.stm] but that it doesn't match the description in the article. Usrnme h8er (talk · contribs) 16:34, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. Gives no information on party views or actual significance. Quantumobserver (talk) 18:25, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Agree with H8er. looks like self-promotional material and asserts no real platform points or notability. ThuranX (talk) 21:03, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete: Fails WP:N. Schuym1 (talk) 00:01, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Non-notable at best. Edward321 (talk) 06:06, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:38, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:38, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:38, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete At least two parties with this name have existed, one that deregistered in 2002 and another registered in 2007 that renamed to Independent Action, and deregistered in 2008.[http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/63167/Renamed-or-Deregistered-Parties.pdf] Maybe a valid article could be created about the Grey Party that existed until 2002, sources exist[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/999115.stm][http://archive.theargus.co.uk/2000/11/10/186756.html][http://archive.echo-news.co.uk/2001/5/24/181383.html][http://archive.essexcountystandard.co.uk/2000/11/7/192902.html], but the article, created in 2007, is probably about the party that existed in 2007–2008, which doesn't appear to be notable as I can't find any sources, or evidence that it is connected to the other Grey Party (also the content doesn't appear to be verifiable, and appears to be promotional). —Snigbrook 23:17, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete per all of the above and WP:FRINGE. Bearian (talk) 01:58, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.