Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grey dwarf

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:49, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

=[[Grey dwarf]]=

:{{la|Grey dwarf}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Grey_dwarf Stats])

:({{Find sources|Grey dwarf}})

Declined PROD Per the outcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stellar metamorphosis. This article is about a specific type of 'star' wholly in terms of the fringe stellar metamorphosis theory. The only source provided is on vixra, and is very much a non-mainstream publication, and not peer-reviewed. No apparent usage by outside sources. (By analogy, this is like a song where the band has no article.) Chris857 (talk) 14:58, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete. Minor element of an extremely marginal fringe theory that has itself been deleted at AFD. Nothing approaching reliable sources exist. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 15:37, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is non-notable pseudoscience. Its only source is self-published. Cardamon (talk) 18:09, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete/KeepIt does not matter if page is deleted or kept. All these records are being posted to my blog as well as the deleting administrator to show my students how new ideas are treated and why wikipedia can not be trusted as a reliable source for unbiased information. Wavyinfinity (talk) 18:16, 24 September 2013 (UTC)wavyinfinityWavyinfinity (talk) 18:16, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete. This shouldn't even be a conversation given previous AfDs. Article creator seems to be disrupting Wikipedia to prove a WP:POINT on his blog. jps (talk) 03:30, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete per nom and previous AFD. Agree this is pointy disruption. Begoon talk 03:45, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable fringe theory and non-notable element of the theory. IRWolfie- (talk) 09:11, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.