Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Growed Definition
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 16:37, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
=[[Growed Definition]]=
:{{la|Growed Definition}} – (
:({{Find sources|Growed Definition}})
In my opinion it is better to have this page in wiktionary and not in Wikipedia. Magioladitis (talk) 13:08, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:15, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Leaving aside the obvious problem that this is avowedly a dictionary definition, it also appears to be original research of a somewhat dubious nature. The Oxford English Dictionary, for example, has historical examples of growed in its entry for grow alongside the standard past tense grew, but no suggestion that growed and grew are different words. Cnilep (talk) 00:52, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Claims that one article or another are a dictionary definition are often overused. In this case, though, it's literally true. That aside, I'm also fairly certain its fundamental (and uncited) claims are complete bollocks. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 17:00, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.