Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gummi (software)

:{{la|Gummi (software)}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Gummi (software)}})

I found zero significant coverage for this software. SL93 (talk) 02:28, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:31, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 02:52, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

---

• Comment—There's a slew of open source LaTeX editors listed on Comparison of TeX editors; many with their own articles. I think that adding a section there with a list of feature summaries and other details would make sense. Regards, RJH (talk) 02:32, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

• delete as a lacking sufficient in-depth coverage by independent third party sources. If such sources are integrated into the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Alternatively, merge / redirect to comparison above. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:44, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:52, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

---

• Delete. Not seeing any signs of sufficient notability. --Legis (talk - contribs) 08:19, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.