Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gunfire

:{{la|Gunfire}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Gunfire}})

I expanded the article with material from other articles. Does anyone want it? This goes to prove that you can make absurd articles like car door slamming. Marcus Qwertyus 08:08, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

• Merge to Gunshot. Or whatever. Pick one, but having both of these would be ridiculous. Shadowjams (talk) 10:33, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• Keep or Merge Obviously gunfire or gunshots have been studied and reported on and are important topics. Wolfview (talk) 10:42, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• Merge to Gunshot. Another example of the engine's poor default search perhaps? Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:14, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
• An {{oldid|Gunfire|232132426|unassuming and helpful little disambiguation article}} disambiguating four things by this name (and inviting people to write some missing articles) has been {{diff|Gunfire|prev|405650916|blanked by Marcus Qwertyus}} (with the false edit summary "cleanup") merely in order to then pointfully nominate it for deletion a few minutes later. Blanking an article then pointfully nominating it for deletion is not productive nor an improvement to the encyclopaedia, nor indeed helpful to readers who want to find the disambiguated subjects (nor indeed helpful to writers who want to see where potential for further articles is). Give us the original disambiguation article back. Uncle G (talk) 12:36, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.