Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guorui Jiang

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice against re-creation with reliable sources to establish notability, be they in Chinese or otherwise. —Darkwind (talk) 13:05, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

=[[Guorui Jiang]]=

:{{la|Guorui Jiang}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Guorui_Jiang Stats])

:({{Find sources|Guorui Jiang}})

This appears to be using a page as a CV - per WP:NOT, we should not be hosting. Would require a fundemental re-write to become encyclopaedic. Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 11:48, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

  • Weak delete: The sheer amount of publications seems to make him notable to me, but that's just an unconscious bias. Most of his stuff is pretty recent. —Ignatzmicetalkcontribs 13:32, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete. GS cites appear to be tiny. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:58, 9 April 2013 (UTC).
  • Delete per above as well as google books has only a few trivial mentions. Maybe it is better know in Chinese texts? SalHamton (talk) 22:07, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete - No evidence of notability per WP:GNG, no secondary sources Adblock2 (talk) 03:43, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.