Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurmat Philosophy

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 06:55, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

=[[Gurmat Philosophy]]=

:{{la|Gurmat Philosophy}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gurmat_Philosophy Stats])

:({{Find sources|Gurmat Philosophy}})

Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought as one of the content of What Wikipedia is not. The article looks like an original research or essay. The article is wholly unsourced and some info look like a hoax. Mediran talk|contribs 09:36, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete - unsourced article, apparently a content fork from Gurmat in Sikhism, possibly a variant form of it. It doesn't look like a hoax to me, rather a well-meant attempt to explain and publicise. Obviously Wikipedia is not a suitable place for this activity, specially given that better articles exist already. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:57, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Comment Please note that the article Gurmat exists. --Anbu121 (talk me) 19:42, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Anbu121 (talk me) 19:52, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Anbu121 (talk me) 19:52, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sikhism-related deletion discussions. Anbu121 (talk me) 19:52, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete - The only references are to the author, where information does appear correct it is duplicated on better pages on Wiki - Yorkshiresoul (talk) 14:39, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete due to three reasons: another article already exists, original research and a bit promotional. --Anbu121 (talk me) 07:32, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete The Gurmat article is sufficient, this article is not needed. --DThomsen8 (talk) 20:15, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.