Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H2No

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 08:28, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[H2No]]=

:{{la|H2No}} ([{{fullurl:H2No|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H2No}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

This is a short article about a type of waterproof fabric that appears to fail our notability guidelines. It is currently unsourced and I couldn't find any information from sources outside the company itself of which one could build an encyclopedia article from. Them From Space 18:47, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete Fails WP:GNG. No sources. Very brief description only on manufacturer's site. Johnuniq (talk) 03:45, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:57, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Comment - there's lots of Ghits, but it also refers to another, possible trademark-violating product. 18:53, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:40, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy redirect Can be covered in parent article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 16:52, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Keep. I can find mention in various back-packer / outdoor magazines, spanning some 20 years (at least I saw one hit from 1989). So it is being debated in those circles as an alternative to Goretex and the other fabrics. Yes, it's sure a short article, it also was unreferenced - coz I just added three refs. Power.corrupts (talk) 22:25, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.