Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HOOPLA!

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:20, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

=[[:HOOPLA!]]=

:{{la|1=HOOPLA!}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=HOOPLA!}})

No appearance of notability; found no additional coverage. PROD expired but was rejected due to a prior PROD which I must've missed. Related OOPSTAD deleted by PROD. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 22:46, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Technology. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 22:46, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Washington. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:39, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Delete: Found coverage for a programming language [https://books.google.ca/books?id=5zoEAAAAMBAJ&lpg=PA48&dq=%22HOOPLA!%22%20programming%20language&pg=PA48#v=onepage&q=%22HOOPLA!%22%20programming%20language&f=false], nothing about this magazine. I don't think we have enough to keep the article... Oaktree b (talk) 00:20, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:24, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Delete Other than the provided reference above, which seems more like a WP:TRIVIALMENTION, I can’t find anything about the magazine and nothing that makes it notable. cyberdog958^Talk 23:32, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Delete Also haven't been able to find any extended coverage (or even that it really existed beyond the one Google Books link in the article) - definitely not enough to prove notability. Gazamp (talk) 02:02, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.