Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Habib Rahman (detainee)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Afghan detainees at Guantanamo Bay. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:58, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

=[[Habib Rahman (detainee)]]=

:{{la|Habib Rahman (detainee)}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Habib_Rahman_(detainee) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Habib Rahman (detainee)}})

On a living Guantanamo prisoner (now released). Fails WP:BLP1E, WP:NOTINHERITED, WP:BIO, WP:GNG. for WP:SIGCOV There are no secondary sources to claim notability of the subject and the citations used are WP:PRIMARY sources (WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 84#Reliability of US military summary reports) DBig Xray 21:20, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

:{{#if:yes|Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. |{{error|This template must be substituted!}}}} • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

:{{#if:yes|Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. |{{error|This template must be substituted!}}}} • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

:{{#if:yes|Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. |{{error|This template must be substituted!}}}} • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Merge and redirect to Afghan detainees at Guantanamo Bay, for the reasons explained by the nom. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:12, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Redirect to Afghan detainees at Guantanamo Bay. No significant coverage regarding individual, fails WP:ANYBIO & WP:GNG. However, as a member of a significant group, a redirect can be left in the article's place.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 15:47, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Delete - subject lacks "significant coverage" in reliable sources as is therefore not notable under WP:GNG. Anotherclown (talk) 06:20, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.