Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hafiz Muhammad Shariq

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. If someone wants this to be userfied then please leave me a message. Hut 8.5 17:52, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

=[[Hafiz Muhammad Shariq]]=

:{{la|Hafiz Muhammad Shariq}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Hafiz Muhammad Shariq}})

Non-notable author. Written by the subject. No reliable sources. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 05:47, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Delete: I found nothing that would make the article pass WP:BIO. SL93 (talk) 00:52, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Neutral (userify if not kept): What about the books cited? Did any one give them a check? The claim in the infobox, "Award for Youngest academic author of the World" is notable (though it is not cited); might have some info in the publications? The page should be moved to creator's userpage if not kept --lTopGunl (talk) 09:29, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

:From which book should biographical information be derived? The Mark of the Beast (talk) 23:20, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

::There are two listed in references. One is only ISBN though. --lTopGunl (talk) 23:31, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

:::I repeat: From which book should biographical information be derived? The Mark of the Beast (talk) 01:00, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

::::I was not telling of a book, rather asking... there are two books given in the references and asked for them to be checked (for biographical or any related information). Just that. --lTopGunl (talk) 01:19, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Keep recently I've uploaded his books on scribd and I add their references, I know him personally, I am not sure that he is a youngest author of world, but I haven't found nay writer younger than him who wrote on the Religion and non-fiction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shibansaleem (talk • contribs)
:— Shibansaleem (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 06:51, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:37, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:37, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:59, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Delete: I have searched the google but I have not found any one reliable source which can be added to save the article.There are very clear WP:Policies and guidelines about WP:Notability and WP:reliable sources.Just a author of books does not make notable till third party has not recognized.I appreciate the work of that young author,but we just can not go beyond the wiki policies.Ehsan Sehgal (talk) 22:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Delete Can't see any independent, reliable sources. Notability is asserted but not established. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 22:06, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Delete as self promotion, résumé, and likely Conflict of interest. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 19:10, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.