Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hagit Borer

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — Cirt (talk) 00:14, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

=[[Hagit Borer]]=

:{{la|Hagit Borer}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Hagit Borer}})

Fails WP:PROF. She apparently "initiated the eXoSkeletal framework in Morphology", but there is similarly no indication that this framework is notable. Jayjg (talk) 04:02, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

  • Keep. Well over 1000 cites on GS in poorly cited area to pass WP:Prof#C1. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:20, 22 June 2011 (UTC).

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

  • Keep: Obviously needs better referencing, which I'm willing to do, but not deletion. Jayjg may have some bias here: he opposed using Prof. Borer as a linguistics-related cite in an article a couple years back (Can search out diffs if anyone wants to see them) and he may have some problem with her current involvement in the Freedom Flotilla II action. (She's on one of the ships.) CarolMooreDC (talk) 13:38, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep. Passes notability requirements. Article can be improved.--EdwardZhao (talk) 14:30, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep Some of her articles get several hundred citation. Also she is named in four different languages on Google News with not just a single incident drawing coverage.--Peter cohen (talk) 14:40, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep Clearly a notable person. She is the author of several academic books, from publishers including OUP, and of scores of articles in scholarly publications; she is a well-known activist, who has apeared in several films and broadcasts, as well as publishing commentary; and she is a passenger in the flotilla. I see no justification for deleting this three-year-old article. It could certainly be improved; but that is no reason to delete it. RolandR (talk) 15:50, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.