Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Half-Heart

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^{talk to me} 05:17, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

=[[Half-Heart]]=

:{{la|Half-Heart}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Half-Heart}})

This is a neologism at best, and more likely something simply made up. VQuakr (talk) 04:22, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Delete. This is a dictionary definition, and Wikipedia is not a dictionary. And, as the nom points out, the term is a neologism at best. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:37, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Snow delete. Or if it's not within 24 hours, I think I'll cry. Poorly written, completely unreferenced dictdef neologism that someone probably made up. Seriously, kill it with fire. TallNapoleon (talk) 06:05, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — —Tom Morris (talk) 06:37, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Delete as dictionary definition (the page is headed "Definition") and neologism ("Thoguh it isnt even in Urban Dictionary" {{sic}}). Cnilep (talk) 06:43, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Delete - as per Wikipedia is not a dictionary and Original Research. -- MelbourneStar☆ ^{(talk to me)} 12:54, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.