Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamilton Community Foundation

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:47, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

=[[Hamilton Community Foundation]]=

:{{la|Hamilton Community Foundation}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamilton Community Foundation}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Hamilton Community Foundation}})

Noble, but not notable. Also an important conflict of interest with User:Tvgdlh, the initials of three HCF staff members (including their PR manager). Raymie (t • c) 23:01, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- N/A0 23:52, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. -- N/A0 23:52, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Plenty of news coverage available [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22Hamilton+Community+Foundation%22], although the three links provided at the article are worthless (one is dead and the other two are to the current edition of the paper, not to the article cited). With rewriting and citations the foundation's notability would be apparent. --MelanieN (talk) 23:03, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

  • Keep plenty of gnews hits as MelanieN shows. many of which are reasonably in depth. LibStar (talk) 07:07, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.