Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hani Al-Dobaini

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎ __EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ . Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:03, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

=[[:Hani Al-Dobaini]]=

:{{la|1=Hani Al-Dobaini}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Hani Al-Dobaini}})

No evidence of WP:GNG. In my Arabic searches I found [http://www.al-jazirah.com/2010/20100104/sp32.htm Al-Jazirah], which mentions him once, [https://arriyadiyah.com/352718 Ar Riyadiyah], which is a one-sentence transfer announcement, and [https://www.alyaum.com/articles/6213841/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%B6%D9%8A/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%86%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%A6%D8%AC-%D8%AA%D8%B9%D8%B5%D9%81-%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%81%D8%AA%D8%AD-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AD%D8%AA%D8%B1%D9%81%D9%8A%D9%86 Alyaum], which has two quotes from him at the bottom. None of this coverage addresses him directly and in depth. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Saudi Arabia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:31, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:32, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 20:58, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Delete BLP, fails GNG, BIO. There are no IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Source in article is a database record. BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV, game news, database, promo. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV). // Timothy :: talk 09:06, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.