Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HappyDoc

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:50, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

=[[HappyDoc]]=

:{{la|HappyDoc}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/HappyDoc Stats])

:({{Find sources|HappyDoc}})

Tagged for notability for over a year, only source is a primary source. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 16:02, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Delete - I cannot find any sources that are reliable or independent. Fails WP:GNG.--FoolMeOnce2Times (talk) 18:36, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Delete. I am unable to find evidence that this topic meets WP:GNG or WP:NSOFT. Gong show 22:25, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Delete There is a brief discussion [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=YEoiYr4H2A0C&lpg=PA698&dq=%22HappyDoc%22&pg=PA698#v=onepage&q=%22HappyDoc%22&f=false here], which amounts to evidence of existence rather than notability, but I am finding nothing that meets :WP:NSOFT. AllyD (talk) 18:29, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.