Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hardball (Palm OS)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Breakout (arcade game). Stifle (talk) 08:34, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Hardball (Palm OS)]]=

:{{la|Hardball (Palm OS)}} ([{{fullurl:Hardball (Palm OS)|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hardball (Palm OS)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Hardball is not notable in any way Jhay116 (talk) 02:28, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete Non-notable computer game. The article fails to assert notability, and there don't seem to be any third-party sources about the game. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 02:47, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Little prose, no references.--Amadscientist (talk) 04:28, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:42, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
  • [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=hardball+palm+OS&btnG=Search&um=1&ned=us&hl=en&scoring=a] shows a number of slightly more than trivial references. [http://www.geek.com/hwswrev/prhrdbal.htm] is a full review. [http://www.expresscomputeronline.com/20020902/tech3.shtml] (2 sentences) and [http://palmzone.net/top10.php] would be an argument for notability (though not a strong one). Eh. weak keep, merge to breakout (arcade game) okay. Hobit (talk) 13:39, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep or Merge Jehorn (talk) 22:06, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
  • :What is your argument for keeping the article? Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 22:30, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
  • :: It is (or was) used by a good number of people. I think it should be kept or merge with Breakout. Jehorn (talk) 20:50, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:49, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete No secondary sources, doesn't assert notability, barely meets the criteria for a stub. - 2 ... says you, says me 20:28, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

:::Merge per Hobit. - 2 ... says you, says me 14:15, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Did you read the above sources? Hobit (talk) 20:40, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

::Yes, I did. Two sentences is not non-trivial coverage, making someone's top ten is not by itself an argument for notability. I accept the review, but we need more than that. - 2 ... says you, says me 15:58, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

:::Thanks, the "no secondary sources" part made me unsure. Why not merge though given that WP:V is met and we have a decent start on WP:N. Hobit (talk) 17:22, 23 June 2009 (UTC) Hobit (talk) 17:21, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.