Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hari Om Dahiya

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Quite clearly not notable, at least not at this point in his career. DGG ( talk ) 03:31, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

=[[Hari Om Dahiya]]=

:{{la|Hari Om Dahiya}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Hari Om Dahiya}})

Disputed PROD. Original reason given for proposed deletion: Fails WP:BIO. Holding a term as a president and chairperson of a branch of a society does not automatically make one notable. Singularity42 (talk) 15:45, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:16, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy delete. Simple case of nn-autobio. — RHaworth {{toolbar|separator=dot|talk | contribs }} 11:45, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Delete I couldnt find any independent, reliable sources to satisfy WP:BIO Norespectasip (talk) 05:17, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Delete. If the The Commonwealth Students' Welfare Group of India is not notable for its own article, then certainly neither is its chairman. Besides, this is clearly just a resume. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 16:11, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.