Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harlequin RIP

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Harlequin RIP}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harlequin RIP}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Harlequin RIP}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. ✗plicit 14:13, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

=[[:Harlequin RIP]]=

:{{la|1=Harlequin RIP}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Harlequin RIP}})

The sources already on this page are either to press release style pages or to the company home page. I had trouble trying to find anything about this because of its current and previous names being so common across the internet. It's been tagged for 15 years, might as well start a discussion on it now. Moritoriko (talk) 06:13, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Software. Moritoriko (talk) 06:13, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Also the article was created by a CoI editor. Moritoriko (talk) 06:16, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.