Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harley Reagan

=[[Harley Reagan]]=

:{{la|Harley Reagan}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harley Reagan}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Harley Reagan}})

Appears to fail WP:BIO. One reliable source, mainly about the practice rather than Reagan, and Bullshido is not a reliable source. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:07, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

  • I support the deletion of this article. The tone has been problematic for a long time (i.e., not neutral), and it has a history of copyright violations. Trying to move it toward neutrality seems to have repeatedly attracted defamatory editing. I know a number of people who use this article as an example of how unreliable Wikipedia can be. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Writesingdance (talkcontribs) 05:12, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
  • That certainly speaks volumes on the subject's notability, where someone who has [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harley_Reagan&action=historysubmit&diff=356689419&oldid=335788368 actively worked to improve the article] still ultimately supports the deletion. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:07, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Thanks for getting my comment signed - I'm still new to figuring out the system and thought it would add my user info automatically. (talkcontribs) 05:12, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.