Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harmony Party UK

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Harmony Party UK}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Harmony Party UK}})

Doesn't seem like a notable political party. The only coverage I was able to find is from a less-than-reliable source [https://www.thecanary.co/feature/2021/01/27/a-new-left-wing-party-aims-to-bring-harmony-to-the-uk/]. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Curbon7 (talk) 05:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and United Kingdom. Curbon7 (talk) 05:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:14, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

:What's less than reliable about The Canary?

:And they have more elected representation than some of the other UK political party pages. ThatCerv (talk) 16:18, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

:* {{u|ThatCerv}}, see The Canary's entry at WP:RSP for issues with that source. Also to the 2nd point, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Curbon7 (talk) 18:27, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

• Delete A small and relatively new British political party without any substantial coverage in reliable secondary sources does not make for a good Wikipedia article. --Grnrchst (talk) 08:22, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:50, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

• Delete. Lacking significant coverage in multiple, reliable, independent sources. czar 12:19, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.