Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harssh A Poddar

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Harssh A Poddar}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Harssh_A_Poddar Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Harssh A Poddar}})

Subject does not meet general notability requirements. Meatsgains^(talk) 01:46, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:40, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Keep. Looks notable to me. Just sayin'. – Athaenara ✉ 18:24, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

: I'm working on citation formats and hope it can be raised to The Heymann Standard. – Athaenara ✉ 19:43, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Keep. It's notable and I am working for making improvements in this article. - Workmk ✉ —Preceding undated comment added 20:23, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

• Comment I see that the article has been deleted as CSD G7 but the discussion at User_talk:Athaenara#Thanks shows that Workmk has already removed the G7 tag. But the article has been deleted, so most likely the CSD tag was not removed. Athaenara and Workmk. What is happening here ? would you guys clear up your intentions ? you should let the AfD run its course, if you have plans to recreate this again. --DBigXrayᗙ 09:57, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

:* {{Reply to|DBigXray}} There's no "you guys" here. I saw the page tagged for deletion, thought it might be saved, worked on its citations for a while, then saw it thrown away some hours later. I never heard of Poddar before yesterday, or Workmk either. – Athaenara ✉ 16:50, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

@User:DBigXray I added G7 tag again because I think that a lot of work on the article is needed to give it a better shape. Further references from independent sources too are needed. I am working on it and will be back with article after few weeks. Thank You

– Workmk ✉ 15:41, 30January 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.