Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haruna Rei

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 00:56, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

=[[Haruna Rei]]=

:{{la|Haruna Rei}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Haruna_Rei Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Haruna Rei}})

:({{Find sources AFD|玲はる名}})

A relatively young tanka poet who has published some poems and been mentioned in a few blogs, but no significant independent RS on her. The book mentioned in the article is self-published, as is her Blue Train magazine. The text of the article itself is taken word for word from the Amazon author description [http://www.amazon.com/What-IVe-Just-Realized-Haruna/dp/1105106950], and thus could be a candidate for speedy deletion as advertising. I think it fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:GNG, but the poetry community in Japan is rather rarefied, so perhaps an expert opinion is necessary. Michitaro (talk) 04:27, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:47, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Delete, subject to change to "neutral" if new evidence of notability comes to light. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Delete. No evidence of any third-party coverage or in-depth commentary to satisfy even the basic notability guidelines. --DAJF (talk) 03:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.