Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hasan family

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice against the creation of biographies on members of this family that may individually be notable. Vanamonde (Talk) 22:49, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Hasan family]]=

:{{la|Hasan family}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Hasan_family Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Hasan family}})

Complete vanity page, zero notability of the family and only two individual have wiki pages. Nothing found to support notability claims and the article itself has only one citation. Individual members may be notable but not the family. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 16:47, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 16:47, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 16:47, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 16:47, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Comment Can any of this be noted on Hassan disambiguation page? Govvy (talk) 22:31, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

comment: the article was created by SPA Nhasan89. A clear COI. —usernamekiran(talk) 02:14, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Delete - a couple of people in this family may be notable, (but from a quick look their references look pretty sketchy), but even if they are notable, WP:BIOFAMILY says that notablility cannot be inherited by the whole family - there are definitely WP:COI issues with the SPA article creator and the language of the article is shamelessly promotional ("esteemed Bangladeshi family", "contributed exceptionally" WP:NOTPROMOTION), the language could be cleaned up, but the article would still not be notable - does not meet WP:BASIC or WP:ANYBIO as there is no significant coverage of the family in multiple reliable secondary sources - the Biographical Encyclopedia of Pakistan is available online through Google books; a search revealed that there are people named Hasan and Hassan in there, but I could not identify any of them as members of the Hasan family of the article - Epinoia (talk) 01:42, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Since the Hasan family in this article is from Bangladesh the Biographical dictionary of Pakistan has no relevance.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:29, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

::*Comment - the Biographical dictionary of Pakistan is cited as a source in the article - Epinoia (talk) 17:35, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Comment The fact we lack an article on Ubaydul Hasan who was a Grand Vizier in an indepdent state, shows how Amero-centric and presentist Wikipedia is. He is clearly without question notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:28, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Delete as failing WP:GNG. For a page to survive we need suitable coverage of the family itself, rather than just individual members, and we don't have that. 2A02:C7F:4481:8300:90DC:E235:5074:54B0 (talk) 19:45, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.