Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hatashe Channel

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 18:20, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

=[[Hatashe Channel]]=

:{{la|Hatashe Channel}} ([{{fullurl:Hatashe Channel|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hatashe Channel}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Little context, no assertion of why this a notable channel, no references, no ghits. Failed {{prod2}}. Toddst1 (talk) 13:34, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Delete - created by a blocked sockpuppet (and since edited by another apparent sockpuppet to dispute the prod), of a master (User:Hatashe) that edits Bangladeshi related topics connected with himself. No sources for this, lacks WP:V. Benea (talk) 13:50, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Delete - lacks any WP:RS to WP:V its WP:N ... Happy Editing! — {{#if:72.75.78.75|{{User|72.75.78.75}}|72.75.78.75 (talk)}} _{15:51, 5 August 2008 (UTC)}
Delete per nom; Benea, the creator of the page doesn't actually have an effect on whether or not it's a worthy article. Ironho lds 19:39, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:43, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy delete as patent nonsense. --Ragib (talk) 02:55, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.