Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haute Living

:{{la|Haute Living}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Haute_Living Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Haute Living}})

This has been around since 2011 and despite tagging as unreferenced, it still has not a single reference. What it does have is advertising babble (with poor spelling) and a distinct whiff of Ownership. However , above all else, if fails WP:GNG  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   12:54, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

• Delete Promotional puff piece entirely unreferenced and fails WP:GNG. Theroadislong (talk) 13:55, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. This thing has been suffering long enough, it's not ever going to be notable, shoot it in the head already. Brianhe (talk) 02:30, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.