Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/He Tian Hao

=[[He Tian Hao]]=

:{{la|He Tian Hao}} ([{{fullurl:He Tian Hao|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/He Tian Hao}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

This seems to be a hoax. It was created by a single-use account two years ago (literally the only edit), and has had only superficial changes since then. No references are cited. On the comment page, somebody else has suggested it may be false, as the instrument involved did not exist in its current form at that point. I can find no non-Wikipedia references on the web to this person. Rigadoun (talk) 05:01, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete I can't find anything about the subject. ChildofMidnight (talk) 23:19, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Not sure if it's a hoax, but it's not notable. 7triton7 (talk) 05:32, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:09, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

  • Comment It doesn't help much, but it's worth noting that we have an article about his "wife" too, Wen Peixin. No sources there either, though. The two articles were written three months apart, by different accounts. And by the way, erhu says that the instrument has existed for 1000 years, although used mainly for accompaniment before the 20th century. Looie496 (talk) 02:57, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete The article fails the smell test, & combined with the other concerns Rigadoun raises would lead me to submit it for deletion. -- llywrch (talk) 23:04, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.