Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Healthy Dining Finder

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Biblioworm 02:14, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

=[[Healthy Dining Finder]]=

:{{la|Healthy Dining Finder}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Healthy_Dining_Finder Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Healthy Dining Finder}})

No significant coverage in multiple reliable sources - only passing mentions! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 10:56, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

:comment The only reference in the article that establishes notability in the slightest is the USA today citation. However, there was an Associated Press article in September of 2006 that was picked up by several newspapers ([http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1350&dat=20060904&id=JnJPAAAAIBAJ&sjid=hQQEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6776,963146 example)], and a decent mention [http://books.google.com/books?id=RlxrIyv753wC&pg=PA28&dq=%22Healthy+Dining+Finder%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=6TxuVJCWH4uuyQSX_YDgBg&ved=0CEUQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=%22Healthy%20Dining%20Finder%22&f=false here]. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 19:17, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Weak keep I think this may pass :WP:WEB due to significant mentions (one paragraph each) at the New York Times and the Today Show. For some reason the USA Today link wouldn't load for me but it may add to notability as well. The AP article noted by 78.26 is significantly about the website and contains information that could be added to the article. --MelanieN (talk) 04:26, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

::I don't know, I didn't see those as significant... they don't, in my opinion, address the topic in detail. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 22:06, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:50, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Keep - I also found this [http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/oct/01/healthy-dining-guide-low-calorie-menu-options/ San Diego Union-Tribune article]. In conjunction with the smaller newspaper coverage already noted in the article, I believe the notability bar is cleared. -- Whpq (talk) 15:09, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Keep the AP article is *entirely* about the subject, I don't understand how you could say it doesn't address it in detail. The source found by Whpq seals the deal, it clearly meets WP:GNG. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:14, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.