Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heather McCartney

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —Theopolisme (talk) 23:39, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

=[[Heather McCartney]]=

:{{la|Heather McCartney}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Heather_McCartney Stats])

:({{Find sources|Heather McCartney}})

No individual notability beyond being the adopted daughter of someone notable. Insufficient coverage in third party reliable sources. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 11:02, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

: The article has a link to an interview with the UK's Daily Telegraph newspaper – is that not a reliable third party source?--Pawnkingthree (talk) 17:27, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

::The article has a link to a forum post that mentions an article in the Daily Telegraph. Lots of people get interviewed by one newspaper. Are there any sources that mention her without the primary focus of the source being that she's Paul's daughter? -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 21:11, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

:::Is [http://books.google.com/books?id=pRSo0BRNUygC&pg=PA52&dq=%22heather+mccartney%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Z4XnUIu-Bqnf0gH1zYCoDQ&ved=0CDcQ6AEwATgK#v=onepage&q=%22heather%20mccartney%22&f=false this] the same Heather McCartney? Rlendog (talk) 01:56, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

::::No. See [http://www.ethnicedibles.net/Cookie_Cutter_Company_About_Our_Owner_New_York_NY.html this]. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 02:03, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy keep, because someone didn't read WP:PEOPLE. Evanh2008 ^{(talk|contribs)} 04:48, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

::What part of WP:BIO does this individual meet? -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 21:11, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

:::WP:BIO states that "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability," with the caveat that " trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability." It is the quantity of the secondary coverage that is most important, and not necessarily the nature of it. As an example (not WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, just a demonstration of this principle in action), we have the article Chesley Sullenberger, even though next to all coverage he has received is directly related to the US Airways Flight 1549 incident.

:::I am not certain as to whether or not the "Young Black and White Printer of the Year Award" meets the "well-known and significant award or honor" criterion or not; someone else may be able to provide more input on that. Evanh2008 ^{(talk|contribs)} 02:19, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

::::I think we're looking at multiple instances of trivial coverage. She wouldn't be considered for inclusion if she wasn't Paul's daughter. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 00:12, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:18, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:18, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Keep yeepsi (Time for a chat?) 23:32, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Keep. - Per Evan. GabeMc ^{(talk|contribs)} 01:05, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.