Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heed (cat)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:40, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Heed (cat)]]=

:{{la|Heed (cat)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Heed_(cat) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Heed (cat)}})

Fails to meet WP:GNG, and is supported by only one source (The Daily Mail). KidAd (talk)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:23, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:23, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Comment Daily Mail has been deprecated as a source (see Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources). Hog Farm (talk) 15:37, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Delete not enough sources to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:26, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.