Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heidi Alaskary

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:39, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

=[[Heidi Alaskary]]=

:{{la|Heidi Alaskary}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Heidi Alaskary}})

The article fails to unambiguously address the WP:PROF criteria. Considering the lengthy résumé the article contains, there seems little likelihood of anything significant being missed and consequently little prospect of the criteria being met in the near future. Roles included such as 'Deputy Ex. Dir.', 'Coordinator' or a trustee are no guarantee of encyclopaedic notability and do not meet the PROF criteria. Raising for discussion rather than PROD due to the number of academic related claims made in the article, though I only find one citation in GScholar and only one other publication citing her paper. Fæ (talk) 10:45, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 10:45, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 10:45, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete. Article is nothing more than a prolix CV and history of her career as a speech path. 1 citation in GS and scholarship awards do not add up to passing notability. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?limit=50&tagFilter=&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=Yanicaracas&namespace=0&tagfilter=&year=&month=-1 Yanicaracas] has created a small WP:WG with Prince Salman Center for Disability Research, the subject's place of employment. Coupled with the fact that this user also upload the headshot of the subject, I suspect a COI promotional effort here. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 16:25, 7 March 2011 (UTC).
  • Delete per nom and Agricola44. I hope someone also will look into the other articles created by this editor (I am a bit short on time myself). --Crusio (talk) 16:47, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.