Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henrik Breimyr
=[[Henrik Breimyr]]=
:{{la|Henrik Breimyr}} – (
:({{Find sources|Henrik Breimyr}})
Contested PROD, no reason given. Football has yet to feature at a fully-professional level therefore fails WP:NFOOTY. Also fails WP:GNG due to a lack of any significant media coverage. --Jimbo[online] 11:52, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --Jimbo[online] 11:53, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 12:25, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league, or received significant coverage, meaning he fails both WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:32, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:N. Ghits are stray mentions in football-centric news reports, primary, social media, a bit in football blogs. Only 18 and seems to have some promise, so I could see him achieving actual notability in future (and not just a technical "meets NFOOTY" characterization). But not there yet. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 17:53, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, as a non-notable player who has yet to play in a fully professional league. Kosm1fent Won't you talk to me? 10:46, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. —Mentoz86 (talk) 22:59, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete for now. As far as I know, [http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/fa_cup/15732455.stm this match] is the closest he has gotten a first-team appearence, when he warmed the bench in the First Round replay, and thereby fails WP:NFOOTY. Also fails WP:GNG, even in Norway. Mentoz86 (talk) 22:59, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 09:19, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.