Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HighDesign

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 09:27, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

=[[HighDesign]]=

:{{la|HighDesign}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/HighDesign Stats])

:({{Find sources|HighDesign}})

Can't find reliable, secondary sources that provide in-depth coverage of this CAD tool in order to establish notability. Google news results appear to be press releases, but it's possible I've missed a real review here or there in more targeted publications. Sourced to it's own web site for six years. j⚛e deckertalk 23:47, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

  • Comment - I've added a few reviews to the external links section. One is mostly press release, but the others seem independent. Don't know if that's still enough to demonstrate significant coverage. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 07:06, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete - Thanks to AdventurousSquirrel for the links. I'm not convincved they establish notability. This [http://www.macworld.com/article/1024476/highdesign.html article] is a product announcement with no critical review and I woudl count it as routine news coverage. This [http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/article/HighDesign_CAD_Software_Updated_With_New_Features article] is a regurgitated press release. This [http://architosh.com/2013/01/introduction-to-high-design-modern-cad/ article] is not bad, but not great. The author(s) indicate that they like the product, but doesn't really provide any sort of review or critical anlysis and so for me, still falls into the category of a product announcement that is routine news. -- Whpq (talk) 15:26, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:32, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.