Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HipVoice

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:35, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

=[[:HipVoice]]=

:{{la|HipVoice}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/HipVoice Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|HipVoice}})

Doesn't pass WP:CORP and WP:PRODUCT. Written like a company brochure so this also violates WP:PROMOTION. Xaxing (talk) 07:08, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Xaxing (talk) 07:15, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Xaxing (talk) 07:16, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Delete - Fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG as I am unable to find substantial coverage of the firm in reliable, independent sources. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:29, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.