Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hitakami
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Tone 18:53, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
=[[:Hitakami]]=
:{{la|Hitakami}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Hitakami}})
Reviewed as new page reviewer. IMO there is no topic here suitable for a Wikipedia article. This is basically a dictionary type entry on the word "Hitakami" with two short unrelated definitions given for it, and no real coverage of any topic. North8000 (talk) 15:11, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:25, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:25, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep and expand, most likely. There are a variety of sources available on this, some of which are available on the Japanese page. The article falls under the same sort of pattern seen at Fusang, Nakoku, Wa (Japan), etc.; I disagree that it is in the class of a dictionary definition. Dekimasuよ! 15:55, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep IMO the changes done since I nominated it have clarified it was a specific topic. North8000 (talk) 13:28, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep -- We do not have a wikigazetteer, so that there is nowhere to transwikify to, which is what I would have noted for if it was a pure definition. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:21, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.