Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hithlum (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The text is unsourced, and there is already a section about Hithlum in Beleriand, so a merger doesn't make much sense. – sgeureka ^t•c 10:46, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Hithlum]]=

AfDs for this article:

:{{la|Hithlum}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Hithlum_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Hithlum}})

No indication this fictional location passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Pure WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to show anything that's not a mention in passing/fictional bio summary. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:15, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:15, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Keep or Merge to Beleriand. Goustien (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:34, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Keep. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:48, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

:*WP:NOTAVOTE. Closing editor is reminded that votes with no rationale are generally not considered of much value. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:22, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Delete or redirect - Insufficient sourcing. TTN (talk) 20:55, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Merge, redirect or delete? I'm discounting the keeps as just a vote and because the IP does nothing but cast drive-by "keep" votes.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:41, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Delete there is no sourcing showing this place is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:45, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
DELETE or MERGE: No sourcing showing any stand-a-lone notability. Merge to Beleriand acceptable, or other pertinent Tolkien list article. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 22:51, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete. Fails NFICTION/GNG. Pure PLOT. Kacper IV (talk) 09:08, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.