Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hitomi (Dead or Alive)
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to List of Dead or Alive characters. No need to prolong (non-admin closure) Aszx5000 (talk) 21:50, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
=[[:Hitomi (Dead or Alive)]]=
:{{la|1=Hitomi (Dead or Alive)}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Hitomi (Dead or Alive)}})
Most of the reception is trivial at best, and some honestly a bit questionable. No signs of SIGCOV, and no real commentary about her as a character. Kung Fu Man (talk) 01:11, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Kung Fu Man (talk) 01:19, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Kung Fu Man (talk) 01:19, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge to List of Dead or Alive characters. There are quite a few video game articles like this, fairly indepth WP:FANCRUFT with questionable sourcing (some highlights in this one include Top 10 Sexiest Female Video Game Characters and Top 10 Babes in Games). Decently written, but just no real WP:SIGCOV. ULPS (talk) 03:31, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge to List of Dead or Alive characters. Niemti created numerous articles solely due to sex appeal of characters and this one is no exception, there's no evidence is notable or passes WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Stuff like "sexiest character" should not indicate importance without a really good justification like it being integral to their character. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 04:16, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge - No SIGCOV, just a ton of vapid, cherry-picked cruft about sex appeal. Sergecross73 msg me 12:11, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. GlatorNator (ᴛ) 12:44, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge Another character that pretends to have reception. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:12, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
:Merge I stand by my statement that boobs are not notable. All the women in DoA are hot, okay? Nobody cares. This is practically WP:ROUTINE coverage of the franchise. Dronebogus (talk) 22:14, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
::Even calling it ROUTINE is generous. It reads more like someone just searched for every passing mention on the internet and forced it into the article without regard for importance or significance... Sergecross73 msg me 01:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge. The reception is mainly one-off comments about the character without any depth. sixtynine • whaddya want? • 03:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- :Passing comments about the character… ‘s breasts. Dronebogus (talk) 06:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge. Lacking sigcov. Too bad, I like her design. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 18:48, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.