Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hong Kong Cantonese Slang

:{{la|Hong Kong Cantonese Slang}} – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Hong Kong Cantonese Slang}})

Unencyclopedic opinion piece, unsourced. Eeekster (talk) 09:51, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

• Delete - unreferenced essay per WP:NOR, though it would be good to see a real article on this subject. MuffledThud (talk) 10:39, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

:*This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:59, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

• Delete Blatant WP:OR violation. Absolutely no reason to keep this on WP. Angryapathy (talk) 17:22, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per G3 It should also be noted that the creator of this article has been blocked indefinately for vandalism, and the only contributions to WP were on this article. Speedy delete criteria G3 met. Angryapathy (talk) 17:25, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 00:35, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 00:35, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

• Delete per MuffledThud. No prejudice to recreation at a proper title based on real sources. cab (talk) 00:35, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
• Delete agree that this is opinion piece, needs significant improvement 137.73.68.56 (talk) 12:26, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
• Delete in present form. May be basis for a serious article, and I have a hunch there probably is. But this version is unsalvageable. --JohnnyB256 (talk) 21:54, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
• Delete this is a meaningless stub. Tavatar (talk) 03:46, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.