Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hope Olson
=[[Hope Olson]]=
:{{la|Hope Olson}} – (
:({{findsources|Hope Olson}})
After existing for four years we have an uncited two line biography. Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG,nothing in the text that shows any Wikipedia:Notability (people) Off2riorob (talk) 20:25, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 11:10, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:38, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:38, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - Per nom. Fails notability criteria for GNG and PORNBIO. EuroPride (talk) 18:23, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep per my comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gillian Bonner and elsewhere--Milowent (talk) 22:14, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Unreferenced BLP. Hipocrite (talk) 15:38, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:ENT, no indication the subject can meet the GNG. IMDB shows only a single tv episode role. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:10, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete the consensus at the RfC was pretty clear that this distinction is not suitable for inclusion within itself, and the RfC was widely advertised with much more participation than at these AfD debates. Because of this sourcing requirement no subjects get automatic inclusion or "inherited notability", which is basically the argument that some editors are making above. I haven't found the level of coverage necessary to meet the GNG. ThemFromSpace 21:54, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.