Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, of course. Non-admin closing. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 05:21, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

=[[House]]=

:{{la|House}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|House}})

Not notable enough. JMartin44 (talk) 20:16, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

:Speedy Keep: Frivolous nomination. Chris (talk) 20:45, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy Keep and suggest deleting JMartin44 instead, perhaps... Peridon (talk) 22:06, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Speedy Keep: This article contains enough non-trivial information about houses cross-culturally that it certainly is not frivolous. For JMartin, I would ask where you would put the informative content in this article? In addition, WikiProject Architecture and WikiProject Home Living have ranked it as Top-Importance. Given that this delete template seems to be placed solely on one user's judgment, it seems that the template should never have been placed, certainly since JMartin44 has absolutely no editing history in Wikipedia outside of posting this deletion template. Unless there is something else going on, this seems to be a simple case of trolling and the template should be deleted post haste. I'm starting to agree with Peridon... -Fenevad (talk) 23:11, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.