Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House PR
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:32, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
=[[House PR]]=
:{{la|House PR}} – (
:({{Find sources|House PR}})
Advertising. Not notable despite being 121st biggest PR agency in the UK! Philafrenzy (talk) 01:31, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:34, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:34, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:34, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- Neutral I was about to register "Delete," however, editor does not appear to be a COI editor so I'm going with "Neutral." If it would be possible to find broader references beyond PR Week (even if they were also trades) I think this could be a fine company stub if some of the language were de-promotionalized. BlueSalix (talk) 17:12, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.