Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House concurrent resolution 50

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 20:39, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[House concurrent resolution 50]]=

:{{la|House concurrent resolution 50}} ([{{fullurl:House concurrent resolution 50|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House concurrent resolution 50}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Insufficient content for own article: The page has a short history of the resolution, and the text of the resolution itself. The resolution text is listed as a candidate to be copied to Wikisource, and the rest can be merged into the main article for Duane Chapman. Musashi1600 (talk) 10:23, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. —Musashi1600 (talk) 10:23, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete: Seems like pure shit to me. Willydick (talk) 11:58, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Not remotely notable, maybe merits half a sentence in Duane Chapman. THF (talk) 15:21, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Non-notable resolution which was never even voted on by the full state house of representatives. The resolution is already mentioned in Duane Chapman, and so no merge is needed. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:14, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete - not notable enough to be in Wikipedia. Wandering Courier (talk) 05:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.