Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HuMo-gen

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Sandstein 08:04, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

=[[:HuMo-gen]]=

:{{la|1=HuMo-gen}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=HuMo-gen}})

Fails WP:NSOFT. The best coverage I could find is four sentences in [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Vicente-Pitogo/publication/352309083_GENEALOGICAL_AGGREGATION_AND_ANCESTRAL_DOMAIN_MANAGEMENT_A_WEB-BASED_GIS_IMPLEMENTATION_IN_A_DEVELOPING_COUNTRY/links/60c2d99f299bf1949f498967/GENEALOGICAL-AGGREGATION-AND-ANCESTRAL-DOMAIN-MANAGEMENT-A-WEB-BASED-GIS-IMPLEMENTATION-IN-A-DEVELOPING-COUNTRY.pdf this paper]. Even this source has dubious reliability: it cites two research articles in this sub-paragraph ([https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_46], [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187661021734732X]), but neither of them mention HuMo-gen. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 06:50, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet, Software, and Netherlands. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 06:50, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Delete. Appears promotional, and I don't think being mentioning in a literature review counts as significant independent coverage - to quote WP:NSOFT inclusion of software in lists of similar software generally does not count as deep coverage.. --Spacepine (talk) 08:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.