Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hurricane Hector (2018)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

=[[:Hurricane Hector (2018)]]=

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Figfires^{Send me a message!} 17:49, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

:{{la|Hurricane Hector (2018)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Hurricane_Hector_(2018) stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Hurricane Hector (2018)}})

I created this article as I figured it would be an important storm at that time, but I now see it for what it is. Hector is simply a fish storm of little to no importance whatsoever. With that being said, I propose the article be deleted. Figfires^{Send me a message!} 17:02, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 August 12. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:27, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
So Hector should not be covered on Wikipedia whatsoever? That's what deletion means if you ask me. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 17:32, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Comment: It is already covered in the seasonal article (Im sure some additions/adjustments would be needed). It simply isnt important enough to have an article of its own. Figfires^{Send me a message!} 17:33, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Not sure why you opened an AFD then; a simple merge proposal would do. "Importance" isn't an appropriate word to be quite frank, largely because storm articles are sub-articles of the season that got split off when nessecary, and thus it's easy to see a situation where a shorter article could be written on a storm that killed 15 people in 1985 compared to 2015. Right now, the MH is 853 words, way too long to fit in the season section (although I'll look into cutting it down later). Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 17:40, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Keep If a tropical cyclone is notable for meteorological reasons, I think it's valid to keep an article for them as long there's enough info to make one, like Hurricane Genevieve (2014). ABC paulista (talk) 17:43, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.