Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyde + Hyde Architects

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:59, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Hyde + Hyde Architects]]=

:{{la|Hyde + Hyde Architects}} ([{{fullurl:Hyde + Hyde Architects|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyde + Hyde Architects}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

declined speedy. looks like spam. fails WP:ORG, no third party coverage in gnews [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?pz=1&ned=us&hl=en&as_scoring=r&as_maxm=7&q=%22Hyde+%2B+Hyde+Architects%22&as_qdr=m&as_drrb=q&as_mind=11&as_minm=6&cf=all&as_maxd=11]. LibStar (talk) 13:31, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:46, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:46, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete Insufficient notability to meet guildelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:59, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete - 3 year old firm; Zero News ghits; no major designs or awards. Bearian (talk) 18:58, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.