Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IBM Building, Johannesburg
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:IBM Building, Johannesburg}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IBM Building, Johannesburg}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:IBM Building, Johannesburg}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. ✗plicit 08:31, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
=[[:IBM Building, Johannesburg]]=
:{{la|1=IBM Building, Johannesburg}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=IBM Building, Johannesburg}})
Fails WP:NBUILD and WP:GNG. Could not find significant coverage. LibStar (talk) 06:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.